Absa Bank Kenya posts 15% profit growth to KSh 16.9B (US$120M) on lower loan-loss provisions and higher non-interest income.

Absa Bank Kenya Profit Rises 15% on Lower Loan Provisions

Nairobi —Absa Bank Kenya posted a 15% increase in profit after tax, reaching KSh 16.9 billion (≈ US$120 million) for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, according to Capital FM. The lender attributed the growth to strong cost management and an 11% rise in non-interest income.

The results position Absa as one of the most resilient banks in Kenya, even as peers contend with tightening margins amid lower interest rates.

Lower Provisions Boost Earnings

The bank cut its loan-loss provisions by around 40%, with impairment charges falling to KSh 4.8 billion (≈ US$34 million). Capital FM reported that this improvement reflects better asset quality and disciplined risk management across Absa’s lending portfolio.

Absa also noted that lower funding costs and efficient capital allocation helped cushion the impact of compressed net interest margins.

Non-Interest Income Supports Growth

Fees, commissions, and other non-funded income rose to KSh 13.6 billion (≈ US$97 million), driven largely by growth in payments, agency banking, and advisory services.

“The diversification of revenue streams has been a key pillar of our strategy,” Absa CEO Abdi Mohamed said in a statement. “Even in a low-interest environment, we have managed to sustain profitability and deliver value to shareholders.”

Deposits and Balance Sheet Strength

Customer deposits grew 9% to KSh 384 billion (≈ US$2.7 billion), while total assets expanded 14% to KSh 554 billion (≈ US$3.9 billion), according to the report.

The bank’s robust liquidity underpins its ability to fund lending and support financial inclusion initiatives, including its agency banking network, now operating in over 8,000 locations across Kenya.

Innovation and Product Expansion

Absa highlighted new offerings such as Sultana, a Shariah-compliant banking product, and Eco Home Loans, aimed at financing energy-efficient housing projects. These initiatives are part of the bank’s broader strategy to attract niche customer segments while supporting sustainable development.

Historical Performance Context

For the first half of 2025, Absa reported KSh 11.7 billion (≈ US$83 million) in profit after tax, a 9% increase from H1 2024, driven by similar trends of lower impairments and strong non-interest income, Capital FM noted. Impairment charges during that period fell by 38%, indicating sustained improvement in credit quality.

Market Implications

Analysts say Absa’s results demonstrate how Kenyan banks can maintain profitability through cost discipline, diversification, and prudent risk management.

“This shows the advantage of balancing interest income with fees and commissions,” said Nairobi-based banking analyst Joseph Mwangi. “Absa’s model may become increasingly relevant as monetary policy fluctuates and margin pressures persist across the sector.”

Outlook

Absa management signaled confidence in maintaining growth momentum through the remainder of 2025 and into 2026. The bank is expected to continue leveraging its diverse revenue base, expanding financial inclusion efforts, and pursuing innovation in digital banking and green financing products.

Mohamed added that the bank remains committed to sustainable, inclusive growth: “Our strategy is to support both shareholder returns and customer-centric initiatives, while continuing to enhance operational efficiency.”

International Perspective

For foreign investors, Absa’s results underscore Kenya’s resilience in the banking sector despite global macroeconomic uncertainties. The bank’s ability to deliver consistent profits while maintaining strong asset quality and expanding its customer base reflects its strategic execution and operational discipline.

Several African central banks plan interest rate cuts as inflation cools. This may reshape banking profitability and financial markets.

African Central Banks Poised to Cut Interest Rates

A number of African central banks are expected to cut interest rates at their final policy meetings of 2025, according to Bloomberg. Inflation has shown signs of cooling across the continent,creating room for monetary easing. Analysts say these moves could have wide-ranging implications for banking profitability and financial markets.

Countries likely to adjust rates include Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria, and Ghana. Lower rates may ease borrowing costs for households and companies, but banks could see profit margins under pressure.

Inflation Trends Allow Easing

African inflation has moderated in recent months. Consumer price indices have slowed across East, West, and Southern Africa. The IMF reports that average inflation in key economies fell below 6% in Q3 2025.

Central banks are responding cautiously. While inflation is cooling, external risks such as high global interest rates and currency volatility remain. Policymakers must balance growth support with financial stability.

Impact on Banking Profitability

Lower interest rates could squeeze bank margins. Commercial banks rely on the spread between deposit and lending rates to generate profit. Rate cuts could reduce these spreads, affecting earnings.

Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) and Equity Bank are likely to feel the impact. Analysts note that lower rates may stimulate credit growth, partially offsetting margin pressure. However, banks with high exposure to government securities may see net interest income decline.

Financial Market Implications

Interest rate cuts could boost local stock markets. Lower rates often make equities more attractive relative to bonds. Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) may see increased foreign and domestic investment inflows.

Currency markets could also react. Softer interest rates may reduce foreign capital inflows, weakening local currencies. Traders are watching the Kenyan shilling and Nigerian naira closely for early signals.

Country-Specific Outlooks

Kenya: The Central Bank of Kenya is expected to reduce its benchmark rate by 25–50 basis points. Analysts say this could support credit growth while maintaining inflation within the 5% target range.

South Africa: The South African Reserve Bank may cut rates cautiously, balancing inflation risks with growth support. Rate adjustments could also affect bond yields in the domestic market.

Nigeria: With inflation easing, the Central Bank of Nigeria could reduce lending rates to stimulate the economy. Lower rates may support businesses struggling with high borrowing costs.

Ghana: Bank of Ghana policymakers are monitoring inflation trends and may act before year-end to support fiscal sustainability and credit expansion.

Challenges for Policymakers

Even with falling inflation, central banks face external risks. U.S. interest rates remain high, pushing capital toward dollar assets. This could limit the effectiveness of rate cuts in stimulating local credit markets.

Currency depreciation, high sovereign debt, and political uncertainty are additional challenges. Policymakers must act carefully to avoid triggering inflation or financial instability.

Outlook for 2026

Analysts expect African central banks to continue a cautious easing cycle into 2026. Lower rates may support business investment and household borrowing. Banks will need to adapt to narrower interest spreads. Equity markets could benefit from more liquidity.

Kenya’s Supreme Court clarifies Standard Chartered KSh32B ($224M) loan dispute, boosting legal certainty for corporate lending.

Kenya Supreme Court Addresses Standard Chartered KSh32B ($224M) Dispute

Kenya’s Supreme Court has issued a ruling in a long-running case involving Standard Chartered Bank Kenya and Manchester Outfitters Ltd. The dispute centers on a KSh32 billion (~$224 million) loan. The decision focuses on procedural points. It ends decades of legal uncertainty for the banking sector.

The case began in the late 1980s. The borrower reportedly defaulted on the syndicated loan. Standard Chartered moved to enforce securities.

The Supreme Court dismissed the bank’s motion for a stay of proceedings. It stressed that banks must strictly follow procedural requirements when recovering loans. (Kenya Law)

Background of the KSh32B ($224M) Dispute

The loan has grown over decades due to interest and legal costs. Manchester Outfitters Ltd challenged the bank’s enforcement of collateral.

Lower courts issued conflicting rulings. The Court of Appeal ordered a damage assessment. It found that some securities were invalid after converting the loan from foreign currency to Kenyan shillings. (Standard Media)

Analysts note that such disputes highlight the difficulty banks face when recovering large corporate loans. Long-term collateral arrangements often complicate enforcement.

Implications for Kenya’s Banking Sector

The Supreme Court ruling does not settle full repayment. It clarifies procedural rules, which benefits both lenders and borrowers. Banks can now enforce loans using established legal standards.

“Strict adherence to procedural norms is essential for loan recovery,” said a senior analyst at Cytonn Investments. “This case also underscores risks in long-term syndicated facilities.”

The decision may encourage earlier settlements, reduce litigation costs, and speed asset recovery. It also sets a precedent for disputes involving currency conversions and long-term loans.

Standard Chartered’s Response

Standard Chartered Kenya welcomed the clarification. The bank said it supports a transparent legal framework for loan recovery.

A spokesperson emphasized: “While procedural clarifications are important, we continue to engage borrowers and courts to resolve outstanding disputes fairly.”

The bank confirmed it remains focused on corporate and retail banking growth while complying with Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) regulations.

Why the Case Matters Internationally

Kenya’s banking sector faces rising non-performing loans, particularly among mid-sized corporates. CBK has raised capital requirements to strengthen financial stability.

The Supreme Court ruling provides confidence to foreign investors and lenders. It shows that Kenya enforces contractual and procedural rights.

This is especially relevant for cross-border banks operating in East Africa. Clear procedural rulings reduce the risk of decades-long legal disputes over loan recovery.

Next Steps

The Supreme Court clarified procedural standards but did not finalize repayment or damages. Further legal processes will determine the final settlement of the KSh32B (~$224M) facility.

Analysts say banks will increasingly rely on structured agreements and regular loan reviews. These measures aim to prevent multi-decade disputes. For Standard Chartered, the procedural win strengthens its legal position. However, litigation over the actual loan repayment may continue.